PAKISTAN REFINERY LIMITED versus INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF CHOUEIFAT THROUGH PRINCIPAL OFFICER
Sections 42 and 54 Civil Defense Act (XXXI of 1952), Section 9 Civil Defense (Special Powers) Ordinance (VII 1951), Section 2 and 6 Civil Defense (Special Powers) Rules, 1951, R 10 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) ), O XXXIX, Rr 1 & 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts, 4 23 and 24 Interim Order Prohibition, Civil Defense Notice Approval Emergency Plaintiff's Refinery Complaint was that the construction of the school by the defendant Was done without. Key Point Intelligence Division Accuracy Notification regarding the provisions of the Civil Defense Act 1952, Civil Defense (Special Powers) Ordinance 1951 and Civil Defense (Special Powers) Rules 1951 was never issued by the authorities regarding suit land. Was. Imposed under a provision of the Civil Defense Act 1952, or under the law governing the defendants' property, the provisions of the laws that were subject to the Civil Defense Act 1952 did not apply to the defendant's property. Can go The provincial government did not exercise its authority to ban defendants from taking any kind of construction on any plan, on the contrary, the provincial government set up a school / educational institution. The plot was allotted to the defendant and the cantonment board approved the building project. The defendants, when no restrictions were imposed under any provision of the Civil Defense Act 1952, then R-10 of the Civil Defense (Special Powers) Rules 1951. Could not be requested to impose sanctions, which were not imposed by the High Court. Enjoying options about building a school building and approving a building project
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
