Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RASHID versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34, Grant of Further Investigation Granted the presence of the defendant at the location of the incident, two versions of an incident were not shown in an FIR, whereas in the present FIR, It was alleged that the accused had been admitted on bail, under section 497 (2), under CRPC, inciting a five-day delay in filing an FIR case against the accused. ?

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• Mst. JAMILA v. YADGAR SERVICE STATION/CALTEX PETROL PUMP 2009 YLR 2018
• Syed ANWAR ALI v. Syed HAMID UMER 2009 YLR 2034
• DODO v. State 2009 YLR 2049
• RANI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Home Department, Karachi 2009 YLR 2056
• ISRAR v. State 2009 YLR 2067
• GHULAM QADIR v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Home Secretary through A.A.-G., Sukkur 2009 YLR 2070
• THE STATE through Chairman v. ABDUL GHAFFAR SHEIKH 2009 YLR 2076
• AZIZULLAH v. State 2009 YLR 2077

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

divorce advocates from Baroute lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes