AAMER ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LTD versus UNITED BANK LIMITED
Section 10 Applicants for leave to apply for leave to end the delay once the applicants have applied for 30 days within the limits set by Section 10 (3), the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance. The summons was sought in the case on 19 4 2008, after the period of 2001, was to be calculated from the same date, 2001, and in the present case, in such a ground banking court, for defending the filing of 30 2008 2008, Cannot justify filing an application on 28 4 2008 or 2 5 2008 to reject the applications of. , While dealing with the petitions, also failed to consider that under Section 10 (2) of the Ordinance, in filing leave to defend the application, if the defendant could satisfy the court, it was delayed. There are plenty of options to forgive. By publishing in newspapers he had no knowledge of the summons, leave to defend the applications moved by the defendants, the banking court should go ahead and decide on the merit high court, u failed the banking court After doing so, put aside the undesirable order instructing the Banking Court to decide on leave requests to defend the case according to the law. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
