CLIFFORD CHANCE versus ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS
RR 25 (3) and 84 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Section 29 (2) Appealed from the High Court Boundary dated 10 2001 10 2001 to obtain a certified copy of the unwanted decision certified on 13 11 2001 The copy was prepared on 5 2002 and it was sent to the appellant on 9 7 2002. Appeals were filed on 9 9 2002. Appellant was requested to be informed of the wrongful decision on 7-11 2001, thus, the difference of six days between 7 11 2001 and 13 11 2001 was contested. Two months count provided under R-84 of Trademarks Rules, 1963 - Validity Appellant did not apply for defamation limitation 1908 because of the specific period for filing an appeal under R-84 of Trademarks Was provided. Rules, 1963 If five days were taken, an appeal should have been filed on 49th 2002, the appeal was dismissed due to a three-day ban. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
