Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AYUB & BROTHERS THROUGH PARTNER versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND ANOTHER

Section 44 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VII R 11 (d) Arbitration Act (X of 1940), Section 34 Permanent Order for Defamation Claims that the Claimant Employer forfeited the Bank Guarantee presented by the Plaintiff Contractor Claims to be stopped. With regard to the dispute between the parties to the arbitration, the plaintiff had to approach the arbitrator for the plaintiff's request for a rejection of the Plaintiff's Validity Forum and the court suit was not barred under the provisions of the Arbitration Act, oh VI , R 11, the plaintiff was dismissed under CPC.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• AAMER ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LTD v. UNITED BANK LIMITED 2009 CLD 342
• ABDUL MAJEED v. State 2009 YLR 344
• INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN v. MUHAMMAD AYUB 2009 CLD 346
• MUHAMMAD UMAR v. YAR MUHAMMAD 2009 CLC 348
• MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. through Attorney v. MUHAMMAD RIAZ JATT 2009 PLC 349
• ABDUL HAFEEZ v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE-VII, SOUTH KARACHI 2009 PLD 350
• MUHAMMAD KHAN v. MUKHTIARKAR REVENUE, KOT GHULAM MUHAMMAD, DISTRICT MIRPURKHAS 2009 PLD 352
• PICIC COMMERCIAL BANK LTD v. ABBAS ALI KHAN KAIMKHANI 2009 CLD 353

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

immigration advocates email from FR Bannu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes