Find a Lawyer

ABDUL JABBAR ABRO versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FOR MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE, ISLAMABAD

The Civil Service Demotion Discrimination Petitioner was charged with misconduct in the constitutional application of Arts 25 and 1991, and, therefore, a prosecution proceeding was initiated and consequently he was prosecuted. After submitting a response from the applicant, the department was alerted and a revised charge sheet of the charges was issued. The applicant's position was stated clearly that the relevant day he was on approved leave and the statement of the charges and charges against the petitioner in the face. The vague and irrelevant inquiries made in this case show that the matter was not in accordance with the proper procedure and, as such, it deviated from the usual rules and regulations in which the defense placed by the petitioner was not All the other officer's penalties were not even considered. The applicant as well as the minor was later changed to a fine while the applicant's case was similar to that of another officer's, while the authorities had discriminated against the applicant against whom the applicant's service record was any If it was not treated then it was dark, then the authorities may again have been justified in taking the harsh action under which the order passed against the applicant was discriminatory, equivalent to an act of patriotism and benevolence. And could not be retained in the eyes of the law, the applicant N had rightly allowed the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court petition. top civil advocates from Lakimarwat lawyer