Article 9 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petitioner's husband was convicted and sentenced to three years imprisonment - RI and fine of Rs 7,500,000, applicant's husband under house arrest questions Had paid the penalty, but after that, his petition expired, the Petitioner requested an amendment to the unclean decision on the confiscation of his said house and was fined Rs. 7,500,000. The prosecution had failed to prove this value in the name of the applicant. He said the house was paid from the victim's applicant's account, proving through evidence that her husband was the owner of the house, but he had gifted it to NAB through a dead council. In the above cases, the applicant's husband, who had considered the applicant's husband, did not leave behind any immovable property for his residual legal heirs, which resulted in questions being set aside, while the remaining proportional decision was made in those circumstances. Was maintained as per the Constitution Petition \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
