Applicant to the Private Complaint Section 200 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/337 F (vi) / 337 L (ii) / 337 F (v) / 337 F (iii) / 449/148/149 In question, the order was issued by the trial court, which rejected the private complaint filed by him, in which case the petitioner was a complainant who filed a case, which was filed in the relevant police station. R was filed, three persons were admitted to the cross version of the murder on the petitioner's request, challaned in the above case, while the cross version of it was found to be false false statements of the petitioner and in his private complaint Record witnesses Or went but the trial court excluded the same cross version of the petitioner and the named accused said that the cross version was found innocent and was kept in column number 2 of the challan, which was sought by the trial court and The ground was also set up to file a private complaint, which was that the cross version suspect was found innocent. Available because this version of the writing was already on the record. The accuser of the cross version was already on record with a special character and the contents of the case could also be presented in a fixed manner and the opinion of the police could not affect the merits of the case. Since the court had to reach its conclusion, the request to reopen the case by filing a new private complaint will certainly be delayed and the trial will be halted. No illegal interference order can be approved for this. Regrettably, the High Court sought to interfere with the use of the revised jurisdiction
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
