Although section 497 (2) of the Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 376/511 bail, the grant of further inquiry was designated in the FIR when it was designated with the specific role of the commission of a felony. The evidence available on record was not convincing. The reason for this is clearly stated in the FIR that two witnesses to the incident, who stated clearly in the FIR that they had seen the incident with their own eyes, and one of the deceased. Is a real brother He said he saw the suspect dragging. Her sister and her attempted to commit adultery with her were found to be part of the FIR story unfamiliar, irrational and unreliable because of a sister's humble attitude towards her sister. Being a silent spectator when practicing was not practically possible. The witnesses, being present at the scene of the incident and both witnesses could easily have arrested the accused when they were empty-handed. The recovery of the broken wire, shalwar and shirt could not directly link the accused to the commission of a crime unless it was confirmed by independent witnesses until he was killed to establish torture marks. No medical examination was performed. The body arguments presented by the accused's counsel were more condemnable than the previous enmity between the parties as it was alleged that the PPC, under the circumstances, had been subjected to enmity under section 6 56 and the11m. I did not file a case against the accused. The accused was charged with further investigation of his crime, so admitted him on bail in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
