MST. SITWAT CHUGHTAI versus JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, LAHORE
Article 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal to Improve Interim Reconciliation Controversial applicants were upset about the amount of interim restitution set by the Family Court that was raised by the Applicants that the Family Court Has set a very small amount as interim maintenance, while maintenance costs were modest 25000 / month, but no details were given about the amount of school fees and other minor expenses in the review, but only a statistic. 25,000 rupees was reported. It was impossible to determine the authenticity of any party's claim without recording evidence, such exercise was not possible in the constitutional jurisdiction, especially if the finding was only temporary and not conclusive and the order in nature was interim, The family court had to make proper maintenance fixes. After the recording of the evidence, the High Court, in exercising constitutional jurisdiction, refused to interfere with the temporary restitution prescribed by the Family Court Petition, was dismissed in circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
