The complainant was asked the question on framing and changing the charge of section 202 and 227 panel codes (XLV of 1860), sections 452, 354, 354 A, 337 A (i), 337 F (i) and 337 F (v). That the unidentified order passed by the trial court accepted the preliminary evidence presented by the complainant under section 354A, PPC, for the removal of the offense and the sentencing of the Judicial Magistrate. This shows that for the first time, Section 354A, PPC is applicable once the accused is not harsh and can be subjected to modification or alteration and hence, Section 227, CR PC K Under one option was for the court, which had the authority to change or increase in any charge at any time. Before the verdict, but it was always subject to the evidence on record against the accused persons, the charge was settled in the present case and the evidence was still to be recorded by the trial court and the witnesses also cross-examined through the accused. Had to do The Ounce Trial Court can base its opinion on the evidence presented by the parties after recording the complete evidence without further record of the evidence and allegations, modification of the charge could not be justified, at which point the trial court approved the inappropriate. Order separated. And the High Court has obtained the remand of the case which should be proceeded according to law.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
