KHURRAM KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
Section 3 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Articles 199 (1) (i) (ii) (c) and (2), 9 and 38 (d), in pursuance of the Constitution of the public interest litigation, was that the Poly. The destruction of various areas of society, namely sewerage system in Thangbag cities. The spread of dangerous diseases such as agriculture, rural life, marine life in coastal areas, public health; cancer. That the use of bags was sterilizing the soil. He said that bags could not be disposed of for many reasons through recycling, that is, it was not possible to dissolve polythene. Disposal through burning of polythene was harmful because it released toxic gases such as dioxin that could have cancer effects on health and could also cause respiratory distress, resulting in short-lived polythene bags. After dumping, throwing, dumping cannot be recovered or burned; some legislation has been made in Punjab province but it was neither effective nor implemented by the authorities. And that the authorities failed to perform their duties under the Constitution, and the law on this subject denied the authorities any adverse effects. We did. And the disadvantages of the manufacture and use of polythene bags and suggest that some steps have been taken, but in favor of having a complete ban on the manufacture and sale of thousands of unemployed workers. Are not. The High Court expressed the devastation caused by polythene bags and said that the petitioner's constitutional petition and matters related to the material were not related to him or any other person.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
