MUHAMMAD MANWAR MUMTAZ versus PAK ARAB REFINERY LIMITED (PARCO) THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR
Section 46 and (rie ()) appealed to the High Court of Appeals in the complaint claiming that he was performing his duties as a firefighter, but for years and years he has been discharged. Regardless of the services, employees were not regularized after completing that complaint. The complaints were filed under Section 46 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, the Appellant submitted that he was issued a duty roster and duty schedule by the employer and after more than 15 years of service he was given permanent leave. Employees' status was achieved, but because of the employer's inactivity, the employees claimed that they were not employees, but were performing their duties as employees of other departments. And that the respondents / four or so departments had no concern with the employees except in the case of a dispute between the employees and the employer, until the evidence was recorded by the two parties by the Labor Court, the dispute was resolved. Can't be By law, the High Court was set aside and the cases were remanded to the Labor Court for judgment on merit \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
