Sections 302 and 324 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), the appreciation of the provisions of Sections 7, 7 (c) and 7 (h) was not a dispute due to history, time and event. Late death occurred and injured. Has suffered injuries. The witnesses in the case were also acknowledged by both parties and only prosecuted under the dispute of the case. The prosecution failed to provide evidence that the counter version evidence was not supported and in this case In the event of participation, both sides were hiding and suppressing its original style. The matter was not brought on record by the parties with the intention of minimizing their respective roles and there was not an hour delay by the presence of four witnesses at the relevant time before the trial court. The 25-minute prosecution case was not affected by filing an FIR, as the complainant was not expected to arrive at the police station to report that the injured and the deceased were left on the spot. The light came on, the two sides knew each other first, the question of wrongful identity of the accused could not arise. There was no background of ill will or misconduct between the parties and nothing was available to him. Provide a basis for dismissing the statements of the injured prosecution witnesses The incident was sudden flare, with no precedent and background or previous rivalry and hence the accused was not liable for any crime for which They were charged and were only responsible. Due to their individual character, the accused hike
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
