Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitioner raised the question of the validity of the order passed by the appellate court in connection with the recovery of the amount mentioned in the petitioner's column no.1, under which the applicant's claim. Claiming to receive money from the petitioner for the amount of Rs 1 lakh mentioned in the Marriage Column 17, the applicant claimed that the amount of one lakh mentioned in the Marriage Column No. 17 was for the respondent at the time of divorce. Ali was to be paid. The appellate court had committed serious irregularities and legal jurisdiction by preventing the recovery of the applicant was the same part of the Naka Nama and could be recovered like Dover amount in the amount of one lakh in the respondent's column number 17. Did not deny the facts of the admission. The marriage contract, however, claimed that it could be claimed or filed and obtained by filing a civil suit, and that if a future is agreed upon under family law, there is between the wife and the husband that any spouse. The performance of the civil suit petitioner can be asked or claimed by the civil, if advised, she can file a lawsuit in the civil court and not an appeal for collection of money under family law. Marriage record recorded by the Court is mentioned in Column No. 17 No interference is sought Usage deleted
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
