Section 498 Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Section 381 An Ad-hoc Pre-arrest Guarantee, The confirmation of the accused was included in the additional statement after a period of two months which raised suspicion in one's mind about its involvement. Because before that there was an FIR, a complaint was filed a month after the incident, then the complainant had no reason to file the FIR immediately when his car was stolen. So before the complainant was involved, the five suspects who were involved in the theft case had already been granted bail by the trial court, which showed that So that the complainant was involved was not sure about the identity of the thief rich fried by the complainant and the police because he is also clearly evident with just a suspicion. And the same thing happened to the accused and the accused was a former offender and they had no criminal record under the circumstances, was it a further investigation into Erie's interim pre-arrest warrant for his crime, which previously Only the suspect has been approved, \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
