Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ ALIAS PIDDI versus STATE

Definition of Section 302 (b) of the evidence was filed with the FIR with reasonable speed and the incident came to light in the day and the accused is known as the complaining party; Error can not ring The scene of the incident cannot be doubted or disputed because of the previous hostility between the parties, the absence of the accused in this case was out of the question because of the false involvement. Was Over time neither the trial nor the ocular testimony was harmed. Witnesses' relationship with the deceased alone was not enough to disprove their statements. Medical evidence did not prove that the defense request made by the defendants in the case was a record crime. Aid in confirmed circumstances of the death sentence of the accused

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• AZHAR HUSSAIN v. State 2009 YLR 671
• SHAHIDA PARVEEN v. NIJABAT ALI 2009 MLD 671
• SHAWAR KHILJI v. MUNAWAR IQBAL GONDAL 2009 PLD 677
• TAHIR ISLAM v. State 2009 PCrLJ 677
• MUHAMMAD SHAKEEL v. State 2009 YLR 683
• JUNAID INTZAR v. UHS 2009 MLD 684
• RIZWAN ASLAM v. State 2009 YLR 687
• ABDUL RAZZAQ v. State 2009 MLD 689

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

law websites from Ukba lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes