Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 392/411 bail, grant of further investigation initially did not include the accused's name in the FIR together with his co-accused, but in the supplementary statement Appeared for the first time. According to the complainant, five days after the incident in which he told that he had found the accused as a supplementary statement, the remaining three named accused were also charged against the accused and his accomplice. The accused was exactly the same. During the hearing of the bail plea of the two accused, the complainant was recorded before the magistrate, in which he had resigned from his first position in the supplementary statement and stated that he had nominated The two co-accused were named on the basis of a misdemeanor complainant in a serious criminal case before himself. The option to declare them to add some people and is understood to yourself. Such an event was the exclusive domain of the Investigating Agency and could not be assigned or assigned to the complainant, which is likely because the accused was also involved in a misunderstanding or at the behest of a body. Can't be denied. In the meaning of subsection (2) of section 497, one of the further investigations was sufficient to present the accused's case, the CCP suspect was admitted on bail, under the circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
