Defendants' denial in favor of the plaintiff in receipt of the outstanding balance by the seller's general attorney after executing the seller's contract for the specific performance of the Articles 12 and e-Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 102 and 103 suits for sale. Refuses to receive a balance amount for an extended period of time. Prior to the sale agreement, the plaintiff had sold the suit to the seller, which the plaintiff knew about. That he was not willing to enter into a sale agreement in favor of the claimant, but to the point that he himself would have agreed with the first seller and if he failed to convince the first seller to withdraw his rights in the suit plot. If left then it will be a sale agreement. The end-seller's attorney testified that while executing the sale agreement, he did not disclose to the defendant that the suit plot had already been transferred to the seller, nothing was available on record In addition to the agreement to sell such a lawyer, an oral agreement also had the effect of the parties that the defendant would first agree to appear in a lawsuit relating to his rights and agree to the transfer in favor of the defendant. Will be either received in a sincere amount or is not mentioned in the sales agreement or on the reverse page of the sale agreement. Verbal evidence of the intention of the parties against the terms of the contract subject to the identity of the first seller under the implementation of the eement, confirming that there was any other condition for the completion of the sale, ie extension of the sale. That would be unacceptable
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
