Articles 302 (b) / 149, 324/149 and 148 were appreciated and other witnesses had no ill will or malicious intent against those who seized the blood-stained ground by chance. That the victims had died on the spot when the prosecution's witnesses dismissed the firearms expert's negative report to no avail. In order to defend the presence of the witness of an injured witness, who was believed to have been removed from the footsteps, he allegedly fired three shots at the victim, as well as all the witnesses. Provide details. In a truthfully impressive cross-examination, the survivor was briefly pronounced dead by the survivor while living in a wounded condom, declining to be written by a police officer and confirmed by a doctor in the hospital, as well as injured. In line with the prosecution's witness statement, it was concluded that neither the accused nor anyone else had brutally killed the three victims, and that the complainant has been punished and the accused kept in the state of affairs. Except for the conviction of an accused, who was a teenager, and apparently because of the orders and influence of his father and older brothers. This crime was, and had been reduced in view of the death penalty to life imprisonment. Mitigating circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
