Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 guarantee, denial of the complainant's presence, deceased widow, who was later involved as a co-accused, cannot be excluded because She was a prisoner of the house where the incident took place and suffered some injuries to her person during the incident when the complainant did not waive the allegations in the FIR, but filed a private complaint. While confirming the allegations, even in the statements made by the witnesses mentioned in the complaint, the accused was the main culprit of the crime. During the interrogation, he was found guilty of an alleged criminal weapon. The pistol was also recovered from the possession of the accused Prima. No serious criminal code of conduct was found, however, there were no conditions based solely on granting the right to bail to those accused of hard sex and delaying the trial before the accused's widow's first. After considering the merits of the bail application, which was later involved as a co-accused Was excluded, however, due to the legal delay at the end of the trial in the merits of the case, the bail was granted as a matter of fact in view of the relevant provisions of the law; no such rights were available to the accused, otherwise, the case of the accused. Was quite prominent. One of the co-accused's bail pleas was found to be imminent, denied in circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
