Laws 18 (6) of the Convention of Martyrs (10 of 1984), Arts 90 to 95, 99, 121, 55 and 128 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199, 4 and 14, and section 18 (6) of the Agricultural Pesticides. Applicability of Ordinance, Max 1971 Max Om Maxim: Omnia Presmantorum Contra Spoletarium: Every speculation is made against the misdemeanor Section 18 (6) of the Ordinance does not authorize a fair trial from the court, which pesticides The drug is manufactured by the laboratory. It contains conclusive evidence of the facts stated and whether the articles or components of the pesticide, to a certain standard, are matters which cannot be determined by recording the evidence of witnesses. It has to be tested in the laboratory through laboratory tests. The ordinance facilitates the conduct of tests by two different laboratories to rule out the possibility of incomplete tests in the laboratory. The final evidence is linked to the second test. , Conducted by the government's analyst Govt. Analyst is an independent body and there is no need to doubt its neutrality. Analyst's report has been presented conclusive evidence, so that illegal sales of adulterated, non-standard and smelly pesticides are banned, therefore. It cannot be considered illegal or unconstitutional. Restrictions on the basic rules are legitimate. It depends on the nature of the contribution and the rights provided for in section 18 (6) is necessary for the achievement of the purpose in the wider interest of the people and the public interest has the advantage over the personal interest. The justification of section 18 (6) of the Constitution. The challenge is neither competent nor had any merit principles
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
