Sections 302 (a) and 302 (b) cannot be expected to immediately report to the police in the traumatic situation that the complainant suffered from the shock and the value of the evidence, and to file an FIR The hour delay was a stimulus to the situation. The incident was proved, but the defendant witness was strengthened by the house being a prisoner and injured witness, his presence at that time, and the location of the incident could not be suspected there was no deep rivalry between the parties. The close relations between them were beyond the consideration of the accused in the falsification of the accused. Before his death, the details of his death were given in full. Admissible molecular evidence in the light was made by witnesses in the light. Reliable eye witnesses presented, including one injured witness, were assisted by medical evidence and the deceased was found guilty during the investigation only on the basis of such evidence not denied. And invoice disclosures that are alleged to be trivial in the event of an incident by the investigating officer cannot be taken advantage of. At any stage during the trial, the accused did not claim to be an underage criminal, nor did he ever present any document showing him to be underage, even That during his trial the Judicial Justice System Ordinance, 2000, even after enactment, the accused never applied to plead guilty to adolescence. The CRPC, the age of the accused, in its statement under section 342
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
