Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), APXNX, RR1, 2 Appeal for a Temporary Order of Trial for Declaration Anonymous Transaction Application for a Temporary Order of Prohibition was rejected by the trial court and rejected by an appeal. The appeals filed against him were also dismissed. The court's plaintiff claimed in this case that the transaction in favor of the defendant with respect to the underlying home was anonymous in nature. However, the terms of the anonymous transaction were not charged itself The plaintiff's title suggests that the plaintiff had given the plaintiff as a bridal gift, for all intents and purposes, that it was a bride's Was a gift and cannot be claimed through this process. As the defendant owns the house, the transfer cannot be filed in favor of his sister, even as a fake deal. Plaintiff did not say what was the purpose of the anonymous transaction in favor of the defendant, which was not pleaded, which cannot be allowed to be proved later by evidence. The second indictment and probate respect for a time. The rule made was that the parties obliged on their requests that the transfer of the house in favor of the defendant by the plaintiff was in the nature of a bridal gift, which contained the germs of defeat. Claiming that the case was anonymous plaintiff in the case, he had no lawsuit and was not entitled to any temporary relief. The following two courts had rightly dismissed his request
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
