WING COMMANDER TIPU SULTAN KHAN versus RUBINA SAIRA ZAFFER
Article 5, Schedule, Articles 6 and 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application Plaintiffs' case for dissolution of marriage on grounds of jurisdiction; A lawsuit has been filed for dissolution. Later, when the defendant moved back to I place, the defendant filed a petition challenging the jurisdiction of the Family Court, which was rejected by the Family Court. The defendant filed a constitutional petition, whether the defendant lived in place L \ or \ I \. In fact, the dispute was `Khola announced by Family Court in place Z, and at that time the jurisdiction of the Family Court was not challenged to` L challenged. In order to avoid a collision of decisions, it was sufficient alone that the decision to dissolve the marriage was decided by a court, instead of all the other sub-cases ld be decided by the same court. It should be preferred to facilitate the female / plaintiff litigation in the family dispute, while deciding the place of hearing of the case, otherwise it was not challenged before, the latter objected. Couldn't go \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
