Section 302 (b) appreciating the evidence was an eye witness witness to the opportunity to be a resident far from the location of the incident, who did not show any specific reason for being present at the time of his presence with the deceased. The accused was sleeping in the same room where the victim and other accused witnesses were sleeping, but no untoward incident took place overnight and what happened early in the morning prompted the accused to kill him. The motive was not explained by the witnesses, the incident occurred at 5am, while the post-mortem examination was conducted at 1am 30 minutes and possibly the story was told in a story and the deceased. Can be used to wait for survivors. In this case, an eye-witness was made that no motive for the incident was established when on the last day of his bodily motion, the accused's offer was to recover the weapon. El Remand was untrustworthy and the report of the Franzic Science Laboratory cannot serve as a controversial piece of evidence, thus, beyond any doubt against the accused, he failed to prove his case, even though the accused was his No appeal was filed against the convict and the sentence, still missing the evidence in connection with the murder case, had reached the aforesaid conclusion, the benefit of which could not be prevented, he was acquitted in the circumstances. Was done.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
