The delay in filing the FIR FIR was not clearly explained in Section 498 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), the section 365B ad interim pre-arrest guarantee, which made this case questionable. It was not possible that within four months, the complainant, the alleged abductor and father of the other family members, did not know who had abducted their daughter. A four-month delay in filing an FIR also raised suspicion in a person's mind about the incident, as well as the suspect's role in the suspect investigation. , Had clearly stated that the alleged kidnapper was not recovered from the accused, there was a previous rivalry between the accused and in this case the accused cannot be denied because of false allegations, in which case the investigating officer He was also told that he was not able to finalize his investigation when the kidnapper had not been recovered. Abroad If this is the case abroad, then the accused have absolutely no role in the abduction and the entire story narrated in the FIR is suspected of further investigation into their crime, His interim pre-arrest bail was already granted, certified \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
