Section 2302 (b) was defined as evidence, the sentence was reduced to two versions, one was presented by the complainant and the other by the defendant confessed to the incident, although it varied in minutes to minutes. Police were notified and no FIR was lodged after a spot inspection and consultation. Independent witnesses in the area generally refuse to give evidence in court, and on this score, there is no denying ocular evidence that in the absence of any animosity between the parties, an account of reflection cannot be made by eyewitnesses. Was excluded, especially when certain features of the incident were recognized by the defendant's version of the defense, which was neither defensible nor feasible; after raising his defense request, the burden of proof was on the law. The evidence was transferred to the accused under Article 121 of 1984, but he failed to avoid involvement in the same case but did not harmonize with the defense's plea. The accomplices were of no use to the accused, as the courts wanted to eliminate the truth from the lies, the purpose of the ocular evidence was fully supported as well as the medical evidence was validated, therefore, the deceased's wrongdoing. The killings were played out by the accused, who killed the deceased to save the honor of his family, the death sentence was changed to life imprisonment.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
