Sections 302 (b), 324, 337f (i), 337f (II) and 71 convictions of conviction, lack of defense lawyer did not challenge the conviction on Qatim Amad's charge and merely abolish the death sentence. Prayed for The accused's sister's son was Mutofi, relations between the parties were pleasant and birth before the incident, and no background of previous rivalry, illness or malicious background resulted in death by his real maternal aunt. Was. As a result of the sudden outbreak, the record was silent as to what had happened before the start of the incident, which compelled, forced or convinced the accused to shoot at his sister's sons, against whom he had no ill will or ill-will Was not sure about. Whether the deceased and the injured witness offered incitement and invited harassment or the accused chose to provocation, the accused was sentenced to death under Section 302 (b), a PPC participant. In view of the aforementioned mitigating circumstances, the trial court had convicted the accused under Sections 7 337F (i) and 7i7F (II) and the PPC had awarded separate punishment for hurting the prosecution's witness. Was heard and thus violated. The principle of merger of minor injuries as listed in Section 71 PPC, according to Section 71, PPC reads with its example (a), in the same transaction, for the multiple injuries to a person. Separate sentences for could not be recorded. And was imposed, since in such a situation the accused was liable only for major injury, so charged, only one conviction is under Section 337F (ii), for the entire beating as a result of PPC, Section 337
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
