MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, FAISALABAD
Sections 6 516A and 9439 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The constitutional application for vehicle treatment against the amendment order was directed by the relevant magistrate to be delivered to the respondent and in the review of the Additional Sessions Judge. Such an order has been maintained. The validity law through an unlawful order made no remedy against a revision order approved by the Sessions Court. The High Court, in the organizational structure of the courts provided for in the Code of Criminal Procedure, showed slowness in the interpretation of the constitutional petition against the Sessions Court-approved review orders, especially when it was evidence-based and not dressed with authority. Or that the material contained on the record was misidentified, or that both the courts below approved irrelevant orders based on reasonable reasoning and all relevant facts. The constitutional application could not determine contradictory questions. The court was a civil court, and the petitioner was already civil Filed in which he failed to receive interim relief Constitutional plea is not favorable, he was dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
