Section Q Qunununun e ehadhadhad Martyrdom ((of of ten)) Proof of Sale of Evidence Preventing Evidence of Oral, Documentary Evidence for Excluding Principal Plaintiff Finding Specific Performance of Execution Agreement by Respondent In their favor, the trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, but the lower appellate court allowed the appeal and the case raised by the plaintiff was dismissed because the defendant failed to prove its version. He withheld the best evidence he had that the defendant had - a slight testimony to the agreement that the defendant had Was not tested to support the version of the version and was the same stand by the other marginal witness on the basis that the rule to withhold the best evidence that the testimony of the law 1984 g (Article 4 of Q) (g) In the case of Articles 102 and 103 of 1984, provided that the defendant's oral evidence (his only statement) was exempt. The defendant also failed to relieve his burden on the issue. And they failed to prove through independent evidence that the sum of the twenty sums they had received as contemplated by the agreement was returned to the plaintiff judge and The record passed by the Ware Appellate Court was based on a misrepresentation of the record, against the prescribed rules of law and due to unlawful interference, the High Court exercised the jurisdiction of the lower appellate judgment and decree passed by the lower appellate court. Set aside and reinstated the trial court, which allowed the appeal in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
