Find a Lawyer

SHAMAN versus STATE

Specific role was attributed to them under Section 497 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/334/336/148/149 bail, the accused were named in the FIR, after the incident, they Escaped and was convicted. In this case the challan against the accused had already been presented in court and it is likely that a trial will be held soon whereby the accused is sentenced to death / life imprisonment / 10 year RI as per section 497, Cr. Prohibited clause. PC accused allegedly responsible for their co-accused's act

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• MUHAMMAD NASEER v. State 2009 YLR 1316
• Mst. IJAZ BEGUM v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION 2009 CLD 1317
• F.M.C. UNITED (PVT.)LTD. v. P.O.P. 2009 PCrLJ 1319
• MAQBOOL BEGUM v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION 2009 CLD 1326
• SHER KHAN v. TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SARGODHA 2009 YLR 1327
• ASAD ALI v. S.H.O. 2009 YLR 1328
• IFTIKHAR ALI HAIDRI v. NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY through Chairman 2009 YLR 1331
• KHALID IMRAN v. State 2009 YLR 1332

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

immigration advocates email from Rawala Kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes