SHER KHAN versus TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SARGODHA
Applicants applying for a declaration and injunction in Articles 42 and 54 of the Civil Code (v. 1908), O XXXX, Rr 1, 2, have temporarily claimed the applicants for the injunction. That they bought the auction shop with questions on lease. He said the auction was confirmed and confirmed and the plaintiff had submitted rent and advance etc. The plaintiff was upset that the authorities temporarily intended to seize the stores, with the request for approval of the injunction, which was rejected by the trial court. And the appellate court endorsement was far higher than the storefront in question, which the plaintiff had previously claimed was auctioned, and the authorities decided, in clear terms, at this meeting Should be given. The rent on the previous tenancy which was higher than the previous one was also outstanding against the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs were not entitled to any arbitrary relief under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
