An important legal question arose during the hearing of the bail plea before Article 498 of the Constitution (XLV of 1860), Article 302/324/427/34 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199. Did the investigating agency have or not? With uncontrollable and unreasonable powers to investigate identifiable cases, or a court may constitute legal scrutiny and sanctions on its jurisdiction in order to answer the question of public importance that touches the root of the criminal justice administration, The application was converted into an application under bail Article 199. All the prosecution witnesses of the constitution did not utter a word against the interrogation accused and their accomplices when seven eyewitnesses came forward with claims from 4 2009 to 11 6 2009 to 12 6 2009 that the accused, his The sons and grandchildren committed the crime on their own at 4 pm 2 pm on 2 pm and could not say their name as they were still present. For three months additional court confession was the worst kind of evidence. While there was no evidence of a joint extra-judicial confession, the Investigation Officer deviated from the established legal rule and the so-called joint venture of the two accomplices. Extra-judicial confession was considered a valid piece. The evidence against all the accused was always interfered with by the High Court, where the investigating agency had investigated or used the powers arbitrarily, without considering all the relevant facts and circumstances of the case, against the investigator in the present case. What was derived Inadequate show about finding the suspect illegally and clearly by the investigator and drawing conclusions
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
