SAFDAR ALI SHAH versus CANTONMENT BOARD TAXILA THROUGH EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Sections 60 and 186 Stamp Act (II of 1899), Section 27A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Real Estate Transfer Tax Price Table Trade Fees, Receipt of the Agreement Settlement in the Transaction Document The impetus for imposing taxes was based on a valuation table prepared by the Executive Officer Cantonment Board, assessed by the executive officer of the Table Cantonment Board, which increased the default rates by the Collector. The proposal was made that contained legal status pursuant to Section 27A of the Stamp Officer. Or. Such rates were offered by the Executive under either the Stamp Act, Section 27A of the 1899, or the Section 60 Cantonment Act, 1924, and were without valid authorization and on the transfer of immovable property to the applicants at the recommended rates. The same cannot be said for paying taxes. From the notification issued by the Cantonment Board, the Board was able to recover the personnel, at the rate of 2% of the tax, the method of receiving and taxing the amount paid by the transfer, the board has There will be no legal option for collecting tax on any amount other than the payment made by the transfer. The transfer documents had to be decided that the Cantonment Board could not charge more and more trade fees than those prescribed by the bylaws, and that too in the case of a violation of the legal provisions contained in the Cantonment Act, 1924 The diagnostic table prepared by the Executive Officer and the implementation of it by the High Court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
