Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 496 and 380 bail, the grant of further investigation, although nominated in the FIR and serious allegations were made regarding the abduction of the complainant's daughter, but it was From the available records and evidence to see, whether the accused who was accused of prosecuting the case was attracted to it, the alleged abductor had filed a section 164 Cr, CR PC It was stated before the magistrate that no one had abducted him, but rather he voluntarily and willingly entered into a marriage contract with the accused. But, on the other hand, he also stated before the Investigation Officer in his statement under Section 161, CRPC, that his earlier statement had been obtained under pressure and pressure. And it was alleged that he had kidnapped her and subsequently committed adultery with her when two contradictory statements, according to the records, could not be relied upon in those circumstances, and it was in fact Not knowing what statement was to be believed, a prosecution witness also testified in an affidavit in which he stated very clearly that he had not seen the incident and that the complaint by the complainant in the FIR The name of the suspect was added, there was no recovery effect from the accused. The offenses under which they were accused of prosecution did not come under the prohibited clause of section 497; CCPC suspects need further investigation; the accused was admitted to bail.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
