Section 302/324/148/149 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 417 (2), none of the accused was present at the time and place of presence, other than the main accused, taking advantage of the suspicion. In defense of the disputed property along with his person, he resorted to firing and, in exercising his right of defense, did not cross the border so much that it could not be weighed in the golden scales, saying that the accused was the only Was due to fire. In addition to a gunshot wound to the casualty, the victim testified in addition to bullet wounds, which prompted the prosecution to always seek medical examination immediately after the incident to prove the prosecutor's ability. And it was never transferred to the accused. If there was a remote possibility of the facts of the defense application, the suspect had to go to the suspect and the contradictory ocular evidence was not proved by any detachment. The decision of Dante Sours Breath was not a complicated decision, arbitrary or unrealistic appeals were excluded accordingly.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
