The suit was decided by the foreign courts of the Section 7 Bank for recovery of the debt and held the plaintiff company and its directors liable for payment of interest payments, including territorial jurisdiction whether by foreign courts. 'S decision was final and proper, against which it was obliged to base its claim. The defendants for the first time filed a lawsuit before the court and abroad, through the appellate court, under the provisions of the Banking Companies (Debt Relief, Debt and Recovery) Act 1997 (which has now been canceled) and Interested in this. The plaintiff's Pakistani currency of equal value claimed that it was a High Court matter, and a decree could be granted on the basis of a foreign decree / decision, in the present case, after considering the entire evidence and Due to this, the inquiry had passed the judgment that the judgment was heard by the court. Because of the correct view of the law, the decisions of the foreign courts did not violate any law in Pakistan and did not violate the principles of natural justice; it was conclusive and binding that the defendants on their return from abroad. Was a resident of. The jurisdiction of the High Court was also settled by the other defendants, the High Court was working for acquiring and carrying on business under the jurisdiction of the plaintiff bank and it had its regional office and the relevant record of the present dispute was filed by the plaintiff. I asked for the country and now it is. High Court considers various aspects of existing dispute over custody of plaintiffs in their regional office
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
