Prior to the arrest of the Section 498 Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Section 489F, the charge of conducting joint business with the complainant was excluded from the evidence on record. That he had submitted a request to the bank, in which the accused requested to cancel the checks, and the issuance of the new checkbook was regularly received by the bank and including the bank. Payment was made on checks. The defendant in question was serious about his claim of theft and misuse of the checkbook by the complainant and took concrete steps to resolve his complaint. He was charged, sentenced to a maximum sentence. Three years, which did not fall within the scope of the section 497 prohibited clause of the CCPC, when nothing was recovered from the possession of the accused. , It would not be appropriate to send him behind bars because it would not serve any useful purpose; the ad interim arrest warrant has already been approved by the accused.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
