Following the trial under the ACLI, R27 Specific Relief Act (of 1877), the section 42 suit for the preparation of additional evidence, the trial court filed an appeal against the judgment and order. Filed under XLI, R 27, for the preparation of additional evidence, the CPC asked the appellate court's jurisdiction agreement that permission to submit the witness testimony was sought, the defendant himself, in evidence before the trial court Had presented. It was his duty that, while presenting the case as a witness in the trial court, no institution had objected to or challenged the offer of the said witness in the trial court if the option was to make any mistake on the part of the litigant. Then it may not be allowed. This was corrected by additional evidence under the OLLI, R-27, CPC, a case which could be considered one of the millions to be filled up at trial.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
