Sections 13 and 15 Appeal Decision to Terminate Tenant Landlord and Tenant Relations The landlord recorded a photocopy of the tenancy agreement, which was signed by both parties, to be with the tenant owner. Claiming he relied on registered sale deed in his favor. The rent controller did not create any issue in relation to the landlord and tenant relationship determination and the order of removal application dismissed by the rental controller was also upheld by the lower appellate court, the property rental controller was the landlord. The tenancy agreement created by the company will also be upheld. And then, despite the express refusal by the tenant to settle the matter in accordance with the law after the initial matter was constituted in this case, under section 13 (6) of the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959, Arrange for the parties to present, examine and evaluate the evidence, and then arrive at the D search to clarify that there was a dispute regarding the method adopted by the Rent Controller and the purpose of the inquiry was But it had to be in accordance with the principles of natural justice, no deviation from such strict duty was allowed while this law Under the options to use. It was required to comply with all the provisions contained in it but it ignored the definition of the landlord as contained in Section 2 (c) of the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959, though the tenant controller approved it. That the property is jointly owned and owned by the property. The father, who later sold it and bought the house
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009