Sections 7A7A (ii) and 7 337F (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) Define the evidence, challenge the applicant's eligibility due to lack of lawyers for the applicants / accused lawyers. Was not chosen and only prayed. He was sentenced to reduce the amount of imprisonment, all the prosecution witnesses were permanent on the material points and there was nothing on record to deny them, slight contradictions in the witness statements for these reasons. That may have been a long time ago. Otherwise the applicant's conviction was not challenged on the merit between this incident and his statement, which is consistent with the fact that the case was dealt with in 1995 and the applicant has been tried for more than six years. The victim was subjected to torture and then an appeal was filed. He was rejected by them and since then the present review request was pending before the High Court, in view of the strange facts and circumstances of the case, the sentence of imprisonment was reduced to the extent under which The agreements given to the applicants will run concurrently and the benefit of Section 382B, CRPC will also be extended to them.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
