SYEDA NASREEN AKHTAR QAZI versus CHIEF CAPITAL POLICE OFFICER, LAHORE
Section 22A & 22B of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Justice of the Peace in its order directed to examine the matter related to Section H and then decided whether there was any confessional offense, The applicant had challenged. The Department of Justice directs Section H to look into the matter, stating that a delegation will be entrusted with the powers of Section H, while the authority to issue a direct directive was under the authority of Justice. This was a matter of clear fraud and that directing the Section HO was not a delegation of authority at all, as the Section HO was independent in its functioning. And when he was brought to his notice and when he was not a Justice of the Peace Investigation Agency, he was able to file a case or deny it on his own, only to determine the basic nature of the case and his direction to Section H. Was for Delegation of powers did not amount to justification Justice did nothing beyond his jurisdiction. In fact, it had opened the door for the applicant. If the Justice of Justice had directly ordered the registration of FIR to Section H, it would have hurt the applicant's observation that if there was an identifiable offense. The matter has to be filed. According to Tao, there was a safe direction and it would be in favor of the applicant or the respondents that the police authorities should be better involved in the case, which, after a preliminary investigation, leads to an identifiable offense. Maybe, the High Court refused to intervene in the matter
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
