The trial court for the possession and declaration of suits Articles 8 and 42 and the appellate court rejected the facts filed against the plaintiff by the accused plaintiff simultaneously, the courts below examined the two courts in depth. A detailed description of the investigation, evaluation and decision-making was given. At the same time, the contentious material evidence and subsequently the plaintiff's inadequate evidence made it clear that there were material contradictions in the testimony of the two witnesses presented by the plaintiff and that the entire property was not occupied. Was. The plaintiff was handed over and the alleged gift in relation to the suit property in favor of the plaintiff was not identified. No material misconduct, misrepresentation or lack of evidence was identified. All points were considered comprehensively in this time's argument. And was answered by both the courts, the finding of the present findings of fact by the court did not guarantee any interference by the High Court in the review, in the following articles, against the plaintiff.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
