Find a Lawyer

MST. RABIA KHIZER versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER

Article 199 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), the constitutional application of Section 6565 Constitution B was rejected by both the applicants of the FIR contract and the law did not allow any third party to challenge its authenticity. , In whose absence the marriage of Sui Georges's girl could not be invalidated. According to the report of the Special Medical Board, the consent of the accused girl has already reached the age of majority and even if she was not yet over 18, she was an adulterous woman, and so on. He was entitled to enter into a marriage contract with his associate accused of kidnapping him and accusing him of being the one who was completely denied by the alleged kidnapper in the FIR. There was no basis for action so the FIR was terminated to save the accused. Misuse of law enforcement was accepted pursuant to a constitutional request

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• NOOR HUSSAIN v. CHIEF PROSECUTOR GENERAL, PUNJAB 2009 PLD 218
• Rao KHALID JAVAID v. FAIZ AHMAD 2009 PLD 220
• RAZIA BIBI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA 2009 YLR 222
• Syed WAQAR HUSSAIN SHAH v. MUHAMMAD YOUNIS 2009 CLC 223
• AHMAD KHAN v. State 2009 YLR 224
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, MULTAN ZONE, MULTAN v. MUHAMMAD ZULFIQAR 2009 PTD 224
• Mst. GHULAM ZOHRA v. REHMAT ALI 2009 MLD 224
• Rana SHAHNAWAZ KHAN v. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, LAHORE 2009 PLD 227

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

us immigration advocates from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes