Article 13 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), VIII, R10 Withdrawal Requirement Forfeiture of defense / written statement right not to submit written statement, justified, a party must be liable to file response Was entitled to accept the request which he had to receive through a written statement and could not be asked to enter a written statement from either party unless the defendant or the copy of the application was provided in the defense / Attacking the right to a written statement will certainly provide a copy of O VIII, R 10, the CPC claimant, and the expulsion of the tenant. S in terms of application, one of the primary responsibility of the claimant. The applicant's right or responsibility for filing a written statement to the plaintiff or the petition, therefore, shall commence when such copy was provided to the defendant, and cannot be directed to enter written data. Unless the copy of the plaintiff is provided and where the trial court's decision against the defendant on failure to file a written statement was not provided, the defendants of the material irregularities constituted in the present case Two occasions were provided with a copy of the withdrawal request, which they could not avail, but there was a twofold request on this aspect, first to see if there was an opportunity and the appropriate opportunity to file a written statement. Has or has put in time constraints. On the shoulders of the defendants, the High Court set aside the order of the appellate court and after giving the defendants the opportunity to file a written response, the petition for retrial for law proceeded.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
