LIAQUAT ALI versus DIRECTOR GENERAL ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT PUNJAB, LAHORE
R19 Constitutional Rules (XLV of 1860), Rules 420/467/468/471 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Article 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Punjab Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules R-19 In re-investigation, in 1985, the Governor, along with the Chief Secretary and the Director Establishment, could submit cats for the record of any pending pending investigation. In the present case, the Governor did not approve any order or neither the directive was sought by the Chief Secretary nor the records were examined, which is necessary to provide such guidance as may be necessary for speedy, fair and equitable disposal. The Chief Secretary did not even demand. The Director General of Inquiry, the Anti-Corruption Establishment, requested a record and only a report, the inappropriate order opened the chapter of inquiry, which had already been closed by the Investigator with the direction of submitting the challan to the court. , No fact and no legal director The Anti-Corruption Establishment had the right to sit on appeal against its own orders and proceedings the Two directors' orders were in the field. At one time he verified and approved the investigation against the accused after examining the record, but upon review he opted to review and changed his first order, there was no rule of law or any law. Which may give the director the power or authority to sit in an appeal against it. The order of re-investigation by the Director-General, which proved to be a judicial proceeding, was not sustainable in the eyes of the law, was declared illegal, with no jurisdiction nor any legal title to it.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
