MASOOD AKHTAR versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (WAPDA)
Refusal to review appeal on section 46 and petition 48 Complaints before the Labor Court Respondents raised an objection regarding the merits of the complaint that SCMR 402 of the Supreme Court 2008 In view of the decision, in connection with the dismissal of the appeal, a judicial order should have been passed by the service tribunal, while no such court order was passed. And only one notice was issued by the Registrar of Services Tribunal stating that without the court's order of the service tribunal, the complaint petition could not be processed before the Labor Court, the Labor Court only applied for the score. The complaint filed by the source rejected the complaint, which was badly targeted in the High Court of Appeal, and was dismissed, which sought to review the legitimate labor court rather than dismiss the complaint. The matter should have been postponed until the approval of the service tribunal's court order, while the Labor Court ruled. Amla was quick and the service suffered a lack of appeal of the applicant, which did not wait for a court order that resulted in the Tribunal order the applicant legal action was approved by the Labor Court. The decision passed in the appeal was reviewed and a remand was obtained in the Labor Court reviewing the case, which was directed to make the same decision. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
