Section 491 Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890), Section 25 Habitat Corps requested the father to recover his son from custody of his mother, who, after divorce, filed a separate Habeas Corpus Notice Petitioner / The father filed a petition under Section 25, Guardian and Wards Act, 1891, before the Guardian Judge, pending the adjudication, the mother being the natural custodian of the child who has the preferential right to hazard, separation between the parties. Or is eligible for custody of a minor in the event of a divorce. No body can take care of the child than the mother, therefore, there was no question of the son's stay in the custody of the mother; no such petition could be filed against the mother in such cases. However, both sides had the freedom to fight this contest. Guardian Joe could present whatever material he wanted to produce in support of children's arguments and their arguments on the merits. In cases where the case was already pending, the court refused to decide on the custody of the child.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
