MUHAMMAD YOUNAS versus BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIA UNIVERSITY THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR
Applicants using unfair means in the examination, who were BSc Computer Engineering students at the University, appeared for the first annual exam in 2007 External examiners, during marking, handwriting of an applicant with the second applicant. I found similarities On the first occasion a case was registered against both the applicants and after receipt of the answers, the Disciplinary Committee provided them with a personal hearing. During the hearing, both the applicants denied the allegations against the applicants. The Disciplinary Committee took action, found him guilty and was fined for disqualification, which would result in him appearing for a period of three years (six occasions). The revision filed against the sentence was also rejected. This was the maximum punishment that could be imposed, while the lesser penalty could also be imposed on a convicted person. The review application was part of the admission record and it cannot be ruled out that there was nothing illegal in the sentencing sentence, but the High Court has observed in the jurisdiction of the parents that if it If less than a punishment is given, that is enough. Meet the end of the sentence of justice which was disqualified for three years on the previous passage .They were restricted to 1 1/2 years. Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 19 \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
